Construction Today - Vol 21 Issue 3 | Page 22

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ADDRESSING CONSTRUCTION ’ S HIDDEN PRODUCTIVITY ISSUE

Although much of construction is the visible output of labor , the process for achieving the finished project is complex . Arguably , it ’ s more complex than it needs to be , writes Robert Salaj

The standard approach to building is widely understood . Every project is broken down by a variety of factors . This includes tools , materials , and a slew of information such as estimates versus actuals , local regulations , change orders , RFIs , submittals , and more . All those project tasks have several sub-tasks , many of which are contingent upon a smooth workflow . A change to one aspect of the project has a ripple effect , which can lead to project delays , higher costs , or even accidents .

Meanwhile , in recent years , construction companies have increased their use of technology . According to Cemex Ventures , investment in construction tech was $ 5.38 billion in 2022 , up from the record-setting $ 4.5 billion in 2021 .
The primary reasons construction companies invest in technology are to boost productivity and get a better view of the status of every part of the project . This way , potential delays can be identified and fixed before it is too late . Unfortunately , for many construction companies the benefits of investing in technology are not meeting expectations . Projects are delayed despite employees putting in longer hours . Why ?
Gray work : the insidious productivity buzzkill
The obvious reasons for project delays are the labor shortage and the rising cost of supplies . Yet there is another not so obvious factor .
22