Construction Today Vol 23 Issue 5 | Page 21

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Freight
The actual number remains buried in material invoices, spread across dozens of POs and sub-billings, so no single report ever shows what transport really costs. The true figure surfaces at project closeout, when the money is already gone, and the same leaks are quietly draining the next job.
Visibility is what protects construction margins Shipment visibility protects construction margins by cutting response time when deliveries go sideways. The true cost of a late delivery depends more on when the team learns about it. Real-time tracking gives the project manager enough warning to resequence the day instead of losing it, so a delay that would once have stalled a crew becomes a quick scheduled adjustment.
Shipment visibility also keeps crews and equipment productive. When superintendents can coordinate crane time, unloading crews, and laydown space around confirmed arrival windows instead of estimates, detention charges fall on the truck side, and idle labor falls on the site side.
Finally, visibility transforms freight from an accepted cost into a negotiable one. Contractors who track actual rates and volumes can benchmark delivered pricing, push for FOB breakouts, and consolidate loads across nearby sites. Timestamped delivery records make damage claims stick and settle detention disputes with evidence rather than argument.
How contractors get Freight visibility There are two routes, and the right one depends on how much freight a contractor moves and how predictable it is.
The first is a transportation management system. A TMS consolidates shipments that currently sit scattered across material POs, sub-billings and equipment moves into a single view, timestamps arrivals, and flags exceptions while there is still time to act. For a contractor running steady volume across a few sites, that alone converts freight from an unmeasured cost into a reported one.
The second is partnering with a 4PL or managed transportation provider. Construction freight is lumpy by nature: volumes spike with the erection sequence, fall away between phases, and shift from project to project. That profile makes a full-time internal logistics function hard to justify, which is why many contractors outsource the management rather than just buying the software. A 4PL brings the system and runs the function on top of it, benchmarking rates, negotiating on the contractor’ s behalf, and settling detention and damage disputes with documentation rather than argument.
One thing worth checking either way: whether the partner owns trucks. A provider with its own fleet has an interest in where the freight goes. One that doesn’ t has no reason to prefer a carrier beyond price and performance.
Either route does the same job. It creates intervention points where costs can be cut before they harden into the project’ s final numbers. ■
Nick Fryer www. sheerlogistics. com
Nick Fryer is Vice President of Marketing at Sheer Logistics. He has over 20 years of experience leading marketing, advertising, branding, public relations, internal and external communications, and sales enablement programs and teams. Nick first entered the logistics industry in 2015 as Director of Marketing for Chicago-based AFN Logistics, and then served as Director of Marketing and Communications for GlobalTranz after the company’ s acquisition of AFN.
construction-today. com 21